Getting to Green

New_york_times_logo_jpegOriginally posted Oct. 24, 2007
by Micheline Maynard The New York Times

Nearly a century ago, Henry Ford declared a customer could have a car
in any color as long as it was black. Now, carmakers around the world
are trying to convince consumers that their lineups come in green. From
BMW to Honda, from Chrysler to Volkswagen, the industry is  rushing  to make  vehicles that use less gasoline or don’t rely on it at all.

Getting_to_green_img_jpeg_2
The push — involving hybrid-electric cars, diesel-powered cars,
flexible-fuel models and vehicles that run on hydrogen — is setting off
the same kind of competitive frenzy that has always surrounded the
development of sports cars and sport-utility vehicles.

But with those models, the emphasis was on power under the hood  and profits that flowed to the bottom line.

Now,
in a turning point, the companies are portraying themselves as
proponents of cleaner, more efficient vehicles, hoping for a dual
payoff in sustainability, both for the earth and for them.

There
is “a new DNA for the automobile,” said Lawrence D. Burns, vice
president for research and development and strategic planning at
General Motors.

Environmentalists, who have begged carmakers
for years to get serious about doing more to help the planet, are
watching the events with a combination of satisfaction and skepticism.

“They
have been dragged kicking and screaming toward producing
more-fuel-efficient products,” said David Friedman, research director
for the vehicles program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Nowhere
is the move more apparent than in Japan, where the Tokyo Motor Show,
held every two years, features the latest shapes and sizes of
environmentally friendly vehicles from Toyota, Honda and Nissan.

The
stakes are highest for Toyota and G.M., which lost its title as the
world’s biggest carmaker to Toyota earlier this year. Of all the
companies, Toyota has spent the most time and money honing its green
image, producing the hybrid-electric Prius and other fuel-efficient
cars.

It has sold more than a million hybrid vehicles around the
world since the Prius went on sale nine years ago. More Toyota hybrids
are reaching showrooms this fall, like the Highlander hybrid and the
$104,000 Lexus LS hybrid, its highest-priced green car.

G.M.,
whose most notable environmental effort was last decade’s EV1 electric
car, is staying close to Toyota’s heels. It will roll out a hybrid
version of a vehicle in its lineup every quarter for the next four
years, 16 in all.

Beyond that, it is placing a huge bet on the
Chevrolet Volt, a small sedan that can be recharged by plugging it into
a wall outlet. Mr. Burns, the G.M. executive, says the Volt marks a
rallying point in G.M.’s effort to be green.

Yet, with gasoline
prices at $3 or more a gallon, and with the environment a pressing
issue for consumers worldwide, auto companies have little choice about
paying attention to developing green automobiles.

As Mr. Friedman
of Concerned Scientists said: “It isn’t just about making more
patriotic and environmentally friendly cars, it’s also good business.
Consumers are walking away from gas-guzzling vehicles.”

Mr. Burns agrees, saying, “For pure, raw business reasons, we’ve got to solve this problem because we want to continue to grow.”

That
realization has meant some serious adjustments for carmakers who gave
the subject little attention or who backed away from their original
commitments.

Some analysts say that Ford and Chrysler fall into
that camp, a particularly uncomfortable position for Ford, which had a
lock on the title of greenest American company a few years ago.

At the time, Ford was headed by an avowed environmentalist, William Clay Ford Jr., Ford’s great-grandson, who served as chief executive from 2001 until last year and remains its executive chairman.

Among
other things, Mr. Ford built an environmentally conscious assembly
plant in Dearborn, Mich., and pledged to improve the fuel economy of
his best-selling S.U.V.’s by 25 percent and to produce more hybrids.

With
the company losing billions of dollars, he retreated from both
promises, saying that Ford needed to take a broader approach to green
issues. But his replacement, Alan R. Mulally, has intensified Ford’s
environmental effort again.

Not long after Mr. Mulally joined
Ford from the Boeing Company 13 months ago, he promoted the company’s
environmental vice president, Susan M. Cischke, making her the first
Detroit executive to have the word “sustainability” in her title.

Mr.
Mulally told her, “The time for talk is past, now we have to figure out
how to be part of the solution,” Ms. Cischke said in a recent
interview. As a result, Ford is “trying to figure out how we prepare
for a future that may look very different,” she said.

That
future will probably include higher fuel economy standards in the
United States, if Congressional supporters get their wish.

Detroit automakers were stung last spring when the Senate voted
overwhelmingly in favor of legislation that would require their
vehicles to get 35 miles per gallon by 2020, up from the current
standards of 27.5 miles per gallon for cars and 24 miles per gallon for
light trucks.

The action has forced the
Detroit companies, along with Toyota, to back slightly higher fuel
economy standards and to take other environmental steps.

Ford_pic_jpeg
Ford, for example, is peddling its hybrid-electric  Ford Escape and Mercury Mariner
S.U.V.’s to Washington lawmakers as patriotic (read: non-Toyota)
symbols of their concern for the planet. It has also captured one
high-profile customer, former President Bill Clinton.

His
official fleet includes a hybrid Mariner, outfitted by Ford to meet
Secret Service requirements. It also has rear bucket seats that provide
more legroom for Mr. Clinton, as well as a minifridge.

For
non-V.I.P.’s, Brian Johnson, an analyst with Lehman Brothers, said he
expected Ford to fill out its lineup with fuel-efficient vehicles
developed for Europe. There, Ford sells a variety of small vehicles
aimed at consumers who are used to paying $6 a gallon for gasoline. Mr.
Mulally, he said, “has a pretty good track record of pushing engineers
farther and faster.”

Joining Mr. Mulally in the drive for
more-fuel-efficient vehicles is Chrysler’s new co-president, James
Press, who spent 37 years at Toyota. Chrysler took its own back seat in
developing hybrids while it was owned by the German carmaker Daimler,
from 1998 until earlier this year.

German officials thought
diesel power, widely used in Europe, was the more realistic alternative
for fuel economy. They pursued hybrid development mostly through a
joint venture with BMW and G.M.

Out from under Daimler’s wing,
Chrysler is now moving quickly to focus on its own hybrids. Mr. Press
told The Detroit News last month that every vehicle in Chrysler’s
lineup would someday be available in a hybrid-electric version.

For
those companies, “it’s not too late, but I believe the next few years
will be critical,” said Roland Hwang, vehicles policy director at the Natural Resources Defense Council.

As
yet, neither Chrysler nor Ford promises anything with the star power of
the Prius or the Volt, which G.M. says it will build beginning in 2010.
The Volt, in turn, has prompted Toyota to accelerate work on its own
plug-in hybrid, which it is testing.

Since neither company has
the batteries to power its vehicles so far, the G.M.-Toyota contest is
fraught with drama over which will get its car to consumers first. Yet
the competition has some environmentalists shaking their heads.

“Companies
that want to thrive in a world where carbon matters and there’s
$80-a-barrel oil can’t just swing for the fences” with one big effort
like the Volt or a Toyota plug-in hybrid, Mr. Hwang said.

“You
have to have technology across the whole line to get you singles,
doubles and triples,” he said. “You’ve got to have a full suite of
technology across the board that you’re using to improve fuel economy
and pollution performance.”

That is where Detroit is trying to
prove it can lead. Along with hybrids and other high-profile vehicles,
G.M. and its American rivals have spent years selling flexible-fuel
vehicles, which can run on a variety of fuels, an area where most
Japanese companies have lagged.

Mr. Burns predicts that
hybrid-electric vehicles, coupled with flexible-fuel models, could
account for as much as 80 percent of the cars and trucks sold in the
United States by 2030, once scientists fully develop alternatives to
gasoline that consumers will willingly buy.

“It’s not just the car that goes from black to green,” he said, echoing Henry Ford. “The energy has to be green as well.”

Where
Toyota is concerned, more than 300,000 Prius owners have already bought
into that idea, although their hybrids in many cases sit in garages
next to vehicles powered solely by gasoline.

No matter what
vehicles Detroit and its rivals develop, Mr. Burns says that ultimately
car buyers will decide whether the environment wins. “Unless you get
consumers involved in this mission, it’s not solvable,” he said.

No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!

Leave a Reply